Skip to main content

Drastic increase of isoprene fluxes in the future climate

Research Topic Chapter
News flash intro
Isoprene is the dominant biogenic hydrocarbon released into the atmosphere. It plays a key role in the composition of the atmosphere because of its influence on tropospheric ozone and its contribution to the formation of fine particles. Isoprene emissions strongly react to changes in temperature and solar radiation and are therefore highly dependent on global warming. We used the MEGAN-MOHYCAN biogenic emission model to estimate, at high resolution, isoprene fluxes over Europe over the past 35 years and in different end-of-century climate projection scenarios.
Body text

In this study we used the MEGAN (Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature) emission model coupled with the MOHYCAN (Model of HYdrocarbon emissions by the CANopy) canopy model to calculate the isoprene fluxes emitted by vegetation in the recent past (1979–2014), and in the future (2070–2099) over Europe.

As a result of the changing climate, modeled isoprene fluxes increased by 1.1% per year on average in Europe over 1979–2014, with the strongest trends found over eastern Europe and European Russia.

For the 1979–2014 period the model used ECMWF meteorology, whereas for the comparison of current with projected emissions, the meteorology was simulated by the ALARO climate model.

Depending on the climate scenario, isoprene fluxes were found to increase between 7% and 83% compared to the control run, and even stronger increases were found when considering the potential impact of CO2 fertilization. However, the inhibitory CO2 effect goes a long way towards canceling these increases.


  • Bauwens, M., Stavrakou, T., Müller, J.-F., Van Schaeybroeck, B., De Cruz, L., De Troch, R., Giot, O., Hamdi, R., Termonia, P., Laffineur, Q., Amelynck, C., Schoon, N., Heinesch, B., Holst, T., Arneth, A., Ceulemans, R., Sanchez-Lorenzo, A., Guenther, A. (2018). Recent past (1979–2014) and future (2070–2099) isoprene fluxes over Europe simulated with the MEGAN–MOHYCAN model. Biogeosciences, 15(12), 3673–3690.  ​Open Access
Figure 2 body text
Figure 2 caption (legend)
Relative differences in isoprene emissions between the control (CTRL) run and three climate scenarios considering the effect of (A) climate, (B) climate and fertilization, (C, D) climate and moderate or strong inhibition, (E) climate, fertilization, and strong inhibition, from Bauwens et al. (2018).
Publication date